Through unit 2 I haven't had that much trouble finding primary sources for my paper. The Arizona immigration law is a extremely popular topic that many people in the world feel very strongly about hence the reason why there's so much information on it. The only real challenge that I was presented with was actually finding my third source. My first and second text chosen was the common perspective of Republican/Democrat, however my third was an outsider who takes perspectives from both sides.
As I started to right my paper I took a bit longer then expected to lay an outline for comparing the articles. Each text has different views but its tying these views together in the paper that I know will be challenging. I hope with the outline that I have I can stay true to proper organization while still providing vital comparisons between the three.
All provide little or none dissenting opinions for their argument
ReplyDelete All believe that there is a problem
Each of them blame it on the others
2 of them are doing it for political reasons
All three believe that there way is right and don’t acknowledge any other perspective
All of them use the same poll
All of them are super serious
All of the articles are text based
All of them feel very strongly about the subject
All of them targets pathos
Differences
Each has their own view
One is a transcript, the other two aren’t
One is republican, one is democrat, one is a third party
Each has different perspectives
Each believe in different things regarding immigration
Each believe that the other is at fault for the problems
Some of them discuss the other side
O’Reilly used a prop pretty much while the others didn’t
Only one of the authors (Marcos) acknowledges that his opinion may go against the popular norms